should be present by default in the basic offer. With these requirements I came to the ECOM exhibition, where the MCN Telecom stand was located. The company manager, Alexander Kim, assured me that the company was ready to implement our requirements in full and in the shortest possible time. And after only a week, the "Virtual PBX" and FMC successfully started working, exactly as we expected. I think this is a very worthy result. I would like to emphasize that some large providers do not consider the small and medium business segment as attractive clients. I had to call the technical support service for half an hour, and the problem was still not solved.
MCN Telecom has a completely opposite finland email list approach - each client is valuable, regardless of the size of their business.For the Russian telecom market, 2016 and 2017 were marked by the almost simultaneous emergence of a whole "pleiad" of virtual mobile operators (MVNO): branded SIM cards appeared at Rostelecom, Sberbank, Tinkoff Bank and even the social network "VKontakte". There were also less promoted projects at other banks and fixed-line operators. in, and is it profitable to maintain a virtual operator? First, a little history The first appearance of MVNO projects in Russia dates back to the early 2000s: long-time subscribers remember the brands Comstar, Matrix, Corbina, etc.
Deployed on 2G networks, they could not claim to compete with the Big Three operators, but served as a kind of testing ground for the latter. The years 2008-2010 saw another surge in MVNO operator activity: large retailers like X5 Retail Group or Auchan, as well as Euroset and others came to the fore. They all worked in light mode: they tried to convert the loyalty of their core customer base into additional revenue, but at the same time they practically did not care about the business strategy of their MVNOs. As a result, they certainly gained some initial subscriber base, but after a short time they became uninteresting.
